Documents, Docudrama, Documentary: Film as Truth and Text
I don't think I could have predicted that at the mainstream AMC Cinema in Montreal, on a given day, that three (count em), three documentaries are being shown. Along with the new romantic comedy tripe, the blood and guts scream screens, and the trivial kid stuff, we are able to screen Taqwacore: The Birth of Punk Islam, It Might Get Loud, and The September Issue. Additionally, it takes little time to find a theatre which is still showing Capitalism: A Love Story. Basically, 1/5 of the films offered in the area are documentaries this week. In my younger, artsy cinema days, listening to thin jazz days, reading Jack Kerowac (not really) days, I would have swooned at the prospect of four new docs. Alas, my cynicism has crept in, and I am wondering if the documentary is the new Hollywood black? Why would so many regular people, grown-up types watch a documentary? Weren't they reserved for we intellectual few?
Naturally, if something hits mainstream, I am suspicious. Could labeling a film a documentary be a veiled attempt to pour bias and agenda into our gaping mouths? Is a documentary a filmed document? How do we determine the auteur and intent? How far can we go in 'trusting' what we are watching?
As a seasoned Roger and Me fan, I swallowed Michael Moore whole from Bowling for Columbine to Farenheit 9-11, then I began to wonder just how sucked in I was. I am certainly one to tell a good story...and make sure I chose what to highlight and what to lose in the re-teling of an event...could Michael be doing the same thing? Could he be emphasizing what he wanted me to see? And, if this is the case, can a documentary ever exist?
I have always contended that history morphs within the nano-second that it occurs. Once an event is over, the interpretation will change continually. Consequently, history is a re-telling of a story, and a fact is a fact only if one believes that it is--this is where our 10th grade philosophy classes come in: big TRUTH, or little truth.
When we examine the film maker, the director, the selection of lens, the placing of camera, the angles, the sound, the vantage point, and the purpose, can any film ever be a document-ary? I suggest it can be instructional, provocative, even life-changing, but it is not truth, not the text, and I am beginning to worry about the ability to discern intent in these films. We may be spending so much time on fiction: deconstucting TV, film, and print, that we start to polarize it against documentaries, and end up with non-fiction...media literacy needs to encompass all genres of media.
But, if you need to go see a flick, by all means hit the AMC and watch a doc--just don't assume it is true.
- Shirley Steinberg's blog
- Login or register to post comments
-
Printer-friendly version- Send to friend
- Topic Tags:


.png)





Comments
Did you know it is Media Literacy Celebration from Nov. 2 to 6?
To my surprise when I logged on to the English Montreal School Board's website an announcement popped out statinmg that it was Media Literacy week from November 2 to 6. I clicked and read the article and I was happy to see how the School Board celebrated this week by recognizing and encouraging media with both the elementary and higschools. They had announcers from the radio stations attend an event at one of it's high schools.
When I listened to FM. 96 the follwing day, the announcers spoke about their experience and how their appearance for this event had a positive impact on the students.
http://www.emsb.qc.ca/en/pressroom_en/pages/onepressrelease.asp?id=632
There was another annocement explaining the the School Board is now part of twitter. It is nice to see that we are teaching our students to become media literate and to appreciate media. :)
http://www.emsb.qc.ca/en/index_en.asp
media literacy, quebec
only quebec has a media literacy expectation in the provincial standards, in this area, at least, we are far ahead of the rest of canada and the united states
One positive side to the QEP!
I first heard about this event on celebrating Media Literacy through my friend and colleague who teaches the Media courses at John F. Kennedy High School. He attended the gathering at Rosemount High School yesterday. The celebration gathering involved a discussion with a high profile panel of Media Celebrities from Montreal’s radio & television world. Shirley mentioned a couple of times throughout the course that Quebec is the only Province in Canada to recognize Media and Media Literacy as part of their curriculum. I found that interesting from a teacher’s perspective, since Media surrounds us on a daily basis. I think its important to expose our students to a variety of different educational areas to prepare them for life after high school, whether it be with further studies in CEGEP or out in the working world. Being able to recognize the different levels of Media, and appreciate as well as question the effects of Media on our society is an asset to the students. When you actually take time to examine how much media we are exposed to in a day, I feel that incorporating this into our curriculum prepares our students to be critical, and not necessarily always believe what the Media throw their way. Under the Quebec Education Program, the Media Literacy is found under the Broad Areas of Learning. I included the link to the MELS website to highlight the 4 major themes under the Media Literacy. The educational aim of the Media Literacy Broad Area Of Learning is ‘to enable students to exercise critical, ethical and aesthetic judgment with respect to the media and produce media documents that respect individual and collective rights’. As teachers in our Quebec schools, we should embrace this attempt to prepare of students for the real world, since part of the education we provide our students is the life skills for the world that awaits them outside of the safe walls of high school.
Advertisers-They got me, and I know it.
The author of chapter 15 writes about how advertisers create content for the purposes of having it “resonate with the knowledge that the listener possesses”. In this sense, the meaning of an advertisement presupposes that I, the viewer, knows anything about the content. Specifically, it's not what I am thinking, but what I desire, feel, or at least, this is what I assume is meant by “dreaming”, about the adveertisement. So, am I being forced to re-purchase that which I already possess. How sneaky.
I describe the iPod on the wall plastered on the wall of the McGill Metro stop as an example of being subjected to monstrously large advertisements displayed one the walls of the metro stops I pass by on my way to school. What happens when I don't desire to listent to music? Are my emotions re-imagined still? Does the huge digital advertisement become null and void to me, or do I purchase an analogue of it? If, according to the chapter, that the intentionality of the display is directly related to my experiences with it, then yes, I believe the ad is lost on me. However, since they are “part of a social reality”, I believe that I am necessarily a part of all other riders' desires of the metro. For if I belong, my reflection to the “resonance” of the big wall-sized display causes me to “feel” something. While I care very little for this “poking the bear” process of the smarmy executives who wish to make me “feel” something on my journey on the proletariat chariot, I am reminded of my own desires to get my thesis started and completed in a timely fashion. And, for this, I require a fancy dancy lappy 486 that will allow me to fulfill my desire of drowning myself in higher education. Odd, I know, but even though I lack a desire to listen to music on the metro, the journey to and fro becomes a time when at least my academic asipriations are reflected upon.
The author turns to Marxist social theory as an explanation of this behaviour. Do I, as the proletariat (You don't see me driving to school in a Hummer, do you?) become so marginalied by my day-to-day journey that I fail to recongize that which goes beyond the mass-cultural dellusion that we all need a fancy music player? Do I fail to take notice of the art pieces that flank the walls of each and every metro stop? Do I let advertisements tell ME what my hopes and wants are? Not specifically no, but, if they at least cause me to reflect upon my own desires, then yes, I think so. Even though I still fail to recognize the beauty of blasting Duran Duran on my way to school, I find myself writing this report on a laptop manufactured by the same company that makes those music players I was rambling about a paragraph above. Even though the ad does very little to evoke my emotions about the specific content of it, it does force me, probably through its LACK of relevance, to drift in and out of my own mind, while I rehearse the setup and breakdown of my master's reearch proposal. In this sense, the ad does does allow me to fail to see the dominant discourse of the domiant demographic of the passengers I share a metro car with (young hip urban youth who desire to share their ride with the graces of any of the top 30 music video singeres of the week?) However, I feel this distraction from reality is a productive one, even though the ad does remind me, through a connection formed between the manufacturer of the music player and the one of my work horse laptop, of the ultimate reason for my trip: to learn somthing.
Documents, Docudrama, Documentary: Film as Truth and Text